“贤松”闹剧，该立刻收场了

newlife2017 · 发表于前天 23:06

有个叫“贤松”的网民，如今在MF圈子的知名度正在蹿升。这种“知名度”并非源自创作贡献，而是因其反复践踏社区规则、屡次侵权、令人瞠目的沟通障碍以及持续骚扰他人所共同发酵的一场闹剧。从早期在资源群纠缠索要未发布作品及工程文件，到如今公然使用来路不明、疑似通过反编译手段获取的源文件制作并发布“作品”，其行径早已不是普通的创作纠纷，而已成为社区氛围的隐患。

尽管在资源群被明确告知“工程文件的持有须经作者授权”，这位网民竟反复声称“XXX作者已同意授权”，试图诱导他人提供私有文件。其沟通能力之低下、逻辑之荒谬，已经远远超出正常交流的范畴。

更为恶劣的是，“贤松”近期被曝光多次在其发布的所谓“作品”中，使用了从非授权渠道获取的他人作品源文件素材（例如《Lunar New Year 2022》）。社区对此类涉嫌侵权的帖子作出处理，是维护底线的必要之举；而UP主“无视我233”的一纸声明，更道出了广大创作者的共同心声。

需要明确指出，这类侵权乱象的背后，有着持续滋生的灰色土壤。那些未经作者公开、却在灰色渠道流传的源文件，正是侵权问题的根源。一些用户将来路不明的mfa文件公开分享到群聊、网盘，而相关群聊的管理者却置若罔闻，任其传播扩散。必须重申：作者未公开的工程文件并非“共享资源”，擅自分发更谈不上“学习交流”，这无异于对创作环境的持续侵蚀。这种行径不仅严重打击原创者的热情，损害最基本的信任，更会让整个社区陷入持续的创作焦虑。试问：倘若你们的心血之作被人反编译、拆解、篡改、最终堂而皇之署上别人的名字，你们是否能视若无睹？又是否愿意看着自己的作品沦为他人口中的“素材仓库”？此风不可长，源头必须斩断。

令人遗憾的是，围绕“贤松”的部分互动正滑向荒谬。个别网友以“看戏”心态在私聊中对其挑逗，甚至伪造群聊资料截图引诱其“上钩”，这种行为表面上是“取乐”，实则是在火上浇油、助长歪风。将沟通障碍者当成“赛博宠物”加以戏弄，客观上为闹剧提供了持续发酵的温床，使其得以反复发布侵权内容、骚扰他人，甚至试图参与正常的创作征集活动，令活动组织者与参与者陷入尴尬与困扰。

对待围绕“贤松”所引发的一系列闹剧，不是一笑了之那么简单。它像一面明镜，既照见了个体对规则的屡次践踏，也映出了部分围观者不光彩的推波助澜。这不是偶然，而是放任所致，是底线被一再退让的必然结果。

在此呼吁所有社区成员和看到本文的朋友们：不要向“贤松”提供任何工程文件、素材、信息渠道；同时，也请停止一切戏谑、诱导、起哄行为，这对事态发展有百害而无一利。

这场以“贤松”为中心的闹剧，该收场了。对守则的敬畏、对他人劳动的尊重，才是MF社区这片创作土壤能够延续至今的根基。任何动摇这份根基的行为，无论打着何种旗号，都不得有容身之地。别让闹剧再闹下去——这里不需要更多“观戏”的看客，更不能再有侵权、纵容与起哄交织成的“恶性循环”。

newlife2017 · 发表于前天 23:08

English version of this article:

“The ‘Xiansong’ Farce Must End Now”

A netizen known as "Xiansong" is rapidly gaining notoriety within the MF community. This rise in “fame” has nothing to do with creative contributions, but stems instead from repeated violations of community rules, persistent acts of infringement, astonishing communication breakdowns, and ongoing harassment. From his early days in resource groups pestering others for unreleased works and project files, to now openly releasing so-called “creations” made with suspicious source files likely obtained through decompilation, his conduct has long surpassed the realm of normal creative disputes and become a threat to the community atmosphere.

Despite being clearly informed in resource groups that “possession of project files requires the author’s permission,” this individual repeatedly claimed “XXX author has granted permission,” in an attempt to mislead others into sharing private files. His chaotic communication and absurd logic have long fallen outside the bounds of rational discussion.

Worse still, Xiansong has recently been exposed multiple times for publishing “works” that include assets from unauthorized sources—such as the project file for Lunar New Year 2022. The removal of such posts by the community is a necessary act to uphold the baseline of our shared values. The public statement issued by content creator WSW speaks for many others who have poured their effort into original work.

It must be made clear: behind such infringement lies a festering gray zone. Files never released by their creators are circulating through shady channels—and these are the true breeding grounds of such violations. Some users openly share unverified .mfa files in group chats and cloud storage, while those in charge of these groups turn a blind eye, even enabling further spread. Let us be unequivocal: unpublished project files are not “open-source resources.” Distributing them without consent is not “learning” or “sharing,” but a direct act of corrosion against the creative ecosystem. Such actions demoralize original creators, erode foundational trust, and plunge the entire community into prolonged anxiety over authorship. Ask yourselves: if your own work were decompiled, dismantled, and rebranded under someone else’s name, could you just sit by in silence? Would you willingly see your labor reduced to someone else’s “asset library”? This toxic behavior must not be tolerated, and the source must be cut off at the root.

Regrettably, much of the public’s interaction with Xiansong has descended into absurdity. A few netizens, treating him as mere entertainment, have baited him in private chats and even fabricated fake group screenshots to provoke reactions. On the surface, such behavior may seem like harmless fun—but in truth, it only fuels the fire. Mocking someone with communication difficulties as a “cyber pet” enables the farce to persist, giving him the stage to repeatedly post infringing content, harass other users, and even attempt to participate in legitimate creative events—causing discomfort and difficulty for organizers and participants alike.

The drama surrounding Xiansong is no laughing matter. It reflects not only one individual’s disregard for the rules, but also the unsavory encouragement of bystanders. This situation is not accidental, but the inevitable result of continued indulgence and the erosion of boundaries.

We call on all members of the community, and anyone reading this post: do not share project files, assets, or information channels with Xiansong. At the same time, cease any interactions rooted in mockery, provocation, or mischief—such behavior does nothing to resolve the issue and only deepens the chaos.

This farce centered around “Xiansong” must come to an end. Respect for rules and appreciation for others’ labor are the very foundation on which the MF community continues to thrive. Any behavior that undermines this foundation—no matter what guise it takes—has no place here. Don’t let the farce drag on. This community needs no more idle spectators, and certainly no more vicious cycles of infringement, indulgence, and ridicule.